More on Prior Consistent Statements

A few weeks ago I wrote an article about prior consistent statements in employment cases. I received a note regarding the article from my colleague, Professor Stephen R. Lazarus of Cleveland-Marshall College of Law.  He raised some good points which I addressed in a private response (set forth below). His comments are as follows:

Thank you for the article. It’s a good one. I still have problems with the new subpart:

HR Director Sue: “I fired Stella because she violated the same company policy three times.”
Cross examiner: “Last August you said you thought she violated policy just once, didn’t you?”
HR Director Sue: “Yes, but in October I said it was three times.”

A strict reading of the rule seems to say the prior consistent statement is admissible, both to support credibility and for its truth. I had always thought that it was inadmissible for either one. Allowing it in encourages lawyers to tell their potential witnesses to make out of court statements, preferably in writing, that will be consistent with their testimony, so as to use them at trial once there has been inconsistency impeachment.

Would it be any better if Sue’s prior consistent statement at trial was “Yes, but in February I said it was three times”? I don’t think so, but at least there an argument could be made that a consistent statement made closer to the litigated event tends to rebut an inference of poor memory (you second example).
Is it possible that the new subpart was not actually aimed at generally allowing in prior consistent statement to buttress the witness but rather to just say that if the statement came in to buttress the witness it should also be admitted substantively? The Advisory Committee Notes seem ambiguous on this.

Here’s my response:

Hi Steve. Thanks for your thoughtful comments. The Finch case, which is cited in the article, seems to provide some guidance on the issue you’ve pinpointed. The Army Court of Criminal Appeals in Finch decided that “[a] prior statement admitted under Mil R. Evid. 801(d)(1)(B)(ii) must rehabilitate the credibility of the witness in order to be admissible under the rule. The fact that a statement was repeated in the past, without more, is not very probative in rehabilitating the credibility of the witness’ in-court testimony.” 2019 WL 1211845, *5.  Evid. R. 801(d)(1)(B)(ii) does say that a prior consistent statement is admissible when “offered *** to rehabilitate the declarant’s credibility ***.” So, first and foremost, the prior consistent statement must have probative rehabilitative value. If it does not, or if it’s probative value for rehabilitation is substantially outweighed by the dangers set forth in Evid. R. 403, then it does not come in. As the Finch court said, “Fed. R. Evid. 403, not Fed. R. Evid. 801, remains the primary means of excluding prior consistent statements that have little probative value.” Id. at *5.

Turning to your example, the question is how much rehabilitative value does a prior consistent statement made in October or the following February have, when the witness said something different in August. If it has some probative value on the issue of rehabilitation and the danger of unfair prejudice, etc., does not outweigh it, then it comes in. I think a judge would not abuse his/her discretion by admitting the October/February statement and, in my estimation, if erroneous it would most likely be harmless. Of course, context at trial matters.

The Finch court also cited the Advisory Comm. on Evid. R., Agenda for Comm. Meeting, at 56-67 (3 May 2013) (www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fr_import/EV2013-05.pdf), and the Advisory Comm. on Evid. R., Minutes of the Meeting of May 3, 2013 (www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fr_import/2013-05-Evidence-Minutes.pdf), which provide more insight.

Prior Consistent Statements in Employment Cases Introduction Consider the following separate conversations: HR Director Sue:                  “I fired Stella because she violated the same company policy three times.” Charlie:                                  “The boss threatened…

Admissibility of Co-Worker Statements in Employment Cases General Scenario Sometimes, a co-worker will have made a statement to the plaintiff-employee which is offered as evidence in the case. The statement could be along the lines of, “You’re being let go because you’re too old.” Clearly, the statement will be admissible if made by the employee…

Unpaid overtime is regulated by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C.  §201 et seq.,and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act (“MFWSA”), R.C. Chapter 4111 et seq.. These laws require employers to make and keep employee time records. According to R.C. 4111.08, “[e]very employer * * * shall make and keep for a…

Talk about bad employer decisions when it comes to accommodating employees with a disability. All Linda Atkins wanted was to keep orange juice at her cash register in case she needed it for her diabetes. Her manager refused. So, when Atkins on two occasions felt a diabetic episode coming on she grabbed an OJ from…

Anthony Stephens began working as a Funeral director for R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes in 2007. Six years later Stephens gave the funeral home a letter stating: “Dear Friends and Co-Workers: “What I must tell you is very difficult for me and is taking all the courage I can muster. I am writing this…

The Columbus Dispatch reports that the Ohio General Assembly has passed legislation intended to streamline fights with government over public record requests. The law applies to all levels and types of government in Ohio. The article reports: “On Sept. 28, the Ohio Court of Claims will begin accepting complaints on the refusal to release records…

Anthony Stephens began working as a Funeral director for R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes in 2007. Six years later Stephens gave the funeral home a letter stating: “Dear Friends and Co-Workers: “What I must tell you is very difficult for me and is taking all the courage I can muster. I am writing this…

Kimberly Hively sued Ivy Tech Community College claiming she was not promoted because of her sexual orientation. She based her claim on Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, arguing that employment discrimination against lesbians should be prohibited under Title VII.  Hively of course is correct — such discrimination should be unlawful. Title VII,…

Suing the police is a difficult endeavor because the qualified immunity doctrine shields government officials from liability for their exercise of discretion, unless their actions violate clearly established rights. Most civil rights cases against police officers fail for this reason. Moreover, after a trial court decides the qualified immunity question the case is immediately appealable.…

Following his termination Michael Onderko sued his former employer, Sierra Lobo, Inc. for workers’ compensation retaliatory discharge under Ohio Revised Code 4123.90. The employer argued that Onderko’s injury did not happen at work and that it terminated him for his “deceptive” attempt to obtain workers’ compensation benefits. The trial court threw out the claim because…

On July 21, 2014 President Obama signed an Executive Order prohibiting discrimination against Americans working for companies doing business with the federal government based on sexual orientation and gender identity. What a common sense decision. Why should employers be permitted to fire a fellow American because they are gay or because of their gender identity?…

Chillicothe Telephone Company terminated repair technician Jason Blesedell from his job of sixteen years for falsifying a timecard and impersonating a customer in telephone calls to the company. Blesedell had reported working on buried cables for four hours in the afternoon when work orders did not exist for that work and his GPS showed he…

Later today in Newark, New Jersey President Obama will announce an Executive Order prohibiting questions about criminal history on federal job applications. The announcement comes after years of nationwide lobbying by the “ban the box” movement. The Executive Order is geared toward giving people convicted of crimes a chance to land a job. It’s no…

A recent case out of the federal Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals shows the danger of waiting to assert FMLA time-off rights. In Barrett v. Ill. Dep’t of Corrs., unreported, Case No. 13-2833 (7th Cir., Oct. 20, 2015), plaintiff’s employer had a no-fault attendance policy allowing 12 absences before termination. The plaintiff missed work one time…

To most Americans October 31st is Halloween. To members of the Wicca religion October 31st is one of the most, if not the most, important “sabbats” (solar festivals) of the year. I know this because I was recently asked by a member of the faith whether her employer was legally obligated to give her the…

Dana Ellis worked for Jungle Jim’s grocery. Upon transfer to the seafood department her new supervisor, Caldas, started making lewd comments and suggestions on what she said was a daily basis.  Ellis cried and became physically ill because of her supervisor’s conduct. She needed her job, which paid $9.00 an hour. The store had a…

The federal Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently opined on how direct evidence of age discrimination under the ADEA is to be addressed on summary judgment. In Scheick v. Tecumseh Public Schools, Case No. 13-1558 (6th Cir., Sept. 2, 2015), the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the employer Plaintiff’s evidence consisted, among…

In a case involving unpaid overtime, the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals on September 17, 2015 issued a highly favorable opinion for employees seeking overtime and minimum wage payments. In Porter v. AJ Automotive Group, Inc., 2015-Ohio-3769 (8th Dist., Sept. 17, 2015), plaintiffs claimed nonpayment of minimum wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards…

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (which hears appeals from U.S. district courts in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee) issued a plaintiff-friendly opinion in a race discrimination case on May 7, 2015. In Wheat v. Fifth Third Bank, No.13-4199 (6th Cir., May 7, 2015), the plaintiff, an African-American, initiated a verbal confrontation…

Before bringing an employment discrimination lawsuit in federal court under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an employee must first file a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The EEOC investigates and determines whether there is reason to believe that discrimination occurred. If the Commission finds makes a no…

Company will pay nearly $190K in back wages and interest to 96 former and current female employees and 100 minority job applicants; reform hiring practices.

          Plaintiff Darnell Greathouse complained to the company president that he had not been paid for several months. The employer told him he’d pay when he felt like it, then drew a gun and pointed it at Greathouse. The United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s decision…

       Getting past summary judgment and to trial is what it’s all about. To do that takes evidence. Sometimes trial courts lose their way and by weighing the evidence submitted on summary judgment. That’s what happened in Nigrov. Sears, Roebuck and Co., No. 12-57262 (9th Cir., Apr. 10, 2015).  Fortunately for plaintiff the…

An Executive Order signed by President Obama took effect on April 8, 2015 barring discrimination against members of the LGBT community working on federal projects. The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs is responsible for enforcement of the President’s initiative. When will Congress finally pass legislation banning discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and…

          Settlement agreements in Ohio employment lawsuits often include a provision restricting the employee from applying or working for the defendant in the future. These provisions further often provide that the defendant has the right to terminate the plaintiff if it ever acquires a future employer of the plaintiff.            …

      When an appellate court sums up plaintiff’s evidence as presenting a “fumbling, bumbling case of determined efforts to deny a promotion,” it’s a good day at the office for the plaintiff. That’s how the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals described the evidence in McMullin v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety, No.…

I’ve been meaning to share my thoughts about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Young v. United Parcel Service, 575 U.S. ___ (Mar. 25, 2015). Work sometimes gets in the way, of course. But passage of time allowed me to jot down the following thoughts about what the decision means and its impact on discrimination…

I am boycotting Tyson Foods products in protest over Arkansas’ new “religious freedom” law. That law sanctions discrimination against the LGBT community. I contacted Tyson’s public relations director yesterday to advise that I will not purchase Tyson products until Arkansas repeals its detestable legislation. The company responded quickly. I assume that Tyson used a carefully…

“Indiana’s so-called “Religious Freedom” law is an abomination. No matter what your Governor says, the State of Indiana now sanctions discrimination against a minority of its citizens. It is now legal in Indiana for businesses to refuse service based on sexual orientation in the name of “God.” What’s next — legalization of discrimination against Jews…

Hallelujah! On April 14, 2015 the National Labor Relation Board’s new union election rules take effect. While some management lawyers call them “ambush election” rules, these rules provide important safeguards of employees’ rights to organize and bargain collectively – just as Congress intended when it passed the National Labor Relations Act. The new rules streamline…

A jury decided that the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend Indiana refused to renew Emily Herx’s contract as an elementary school teacher because she was undergoing in vitro fertilization. I like the court’s decision for what it says about overcoming summary judgment in an employment discrimination case: First, Mrs. Herx didn’t need to show prima…

Transgender discrimination is illegal. Why? Because it is gender discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (and O.R.C. 4112.02, Ohio’s anti-discrimination statute). Two federal appellate courts have agreed. So has the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. These courts (the 9thand 6th appellate circuits) and the EEOC riffed off the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in…

The district court in Seale v. Madison Cty., Case No. 5:11-CV-0278 (N.D.N.Y., Feb. 17, 2015) (Slip. Op. at 16), makes clear that “in order to establish [a] claim for hostile work environment, a plaintiff need not show that her “working environment was both severe and pervasive; only that it was sufficiently severe or sufficiently pervasive,…

Plaintiff, the defendant company’s Director of Human Resources, was told by the CEO that he would lose his job unless he agreed to pay back his overtime earnings from several years before. Four days later Plaintiff refused to comply with this demand. The company fired plaintiff three hours later. Temporal proximity alone may not sufficient…

More unions and more union members would be good for America. The labor force is the backbone of the American economy. Gross domestic product (GDP) is driven by a productive work force. Productivity depends upon employees who are secure in their jobs. A primary benefit of union protection is the requirement of just cause for…

Roberts v. State, Department of YouthServices, Case No. 2:13cv335 (M.D. Ala., Feb. 11, 2015) Arthur Roberts, Jr. was hired by the Alabama Department of Youth Services (DYS) as a Security Officer. Within his first few months of employment Roberts notified his supervisor and other administrators that he was an ordained minister and that he wished…

I’m meeting with a new client later today about her potential sexual harassment case. She did not want to share any information with me over the phone. So, I don’t have much information to work with. All I really know is that she is a member of a protected class. That’s it. This led me…

Employers Romp, 8-1 FOR DEFENDANT Davis v. James, 14-6063 (10th Cir., Jan. 15, 2015) Plaintiff waived appellate review of discrimination claims because she failed to make any argument about them until her reply brief. (Citing Stump v. Gates, 211 F.3d 527, 533 (10th Cir. 2000). Moreover, Plaintiff failed to allege that her 2006 EEO complaint…

In Greengrass v. International Monetary Systems Ltd., 13-2901(Seventh Circuit, Jan.12, 2015), Plaintiff sued her former employer alleging retaliation for filing an EEOC complaint. Plaintiff claimed that defendant retaliated by naming her in its annual SEC filings and casting her complaint as “meritless.” The district court granted summary judgment for defendant on the ground that plaintiff…

With the exception of one decision, and an interesting one at that (described below), employers bested employees in these cases: DePriest v. Milligan (E.D. Ark., Jan. 12, 2015) – MSJ – gender discrimination; Wyre v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc. (E.D. La., Jan.14, 2015) – 12(b)(6) – failure to provide protective equipment on the basis of gender…

Employees demoted and later terminated by Family Video have lost their appeal for failure to offer sufficient evidence of pretext.  Brogan v. Family Video Movie Club, Inc., 2015-Ohio-70 (Sixth District, Lucas Cty.,Jan. 9, 2015).

Introduction. Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) is the so-called “prior bad acts” rule. It provides in relevant part: (b) Crimes, Wrongs, or Other Acts. (1) Prohibited Uses. Evidence of a crime, wrong, or other act is not admissible to prove a person’s character in order to show that on a particular occasion the person acted…

The Minimum Wage for Non-Tipped Employees is $8.10 per hour commencing with 2015.  For Tipped Employees the Minimum Wage is $4.05 per hour Plus Tips.

Plaintiff testified at deposition that his father-in-law was present during all of his meeting with counsel and that plaintiff forwarded a fee arrangement and progress invoices received from his counsel to his father-in-law. The Court held that the attorney-client privilege was waived because the presence of plaintiff’s father-in-law was for support purposes as opposed to…

From the United States Supreme Court this week comes a case that makes you scratch your head wondering why justice took so long to arrive for ordinary citizens. Imagine you are in your home after midnight on New Year’s Day when you hear a commotion outside your door. You open the door to find your…

Plaintiff Cung Hnin is of Chin ethnicity from the country of Myanmar. He began working for defendant TOA (USA) LLC on the production floor in 2007 at TOA’s automobile metal stamping plant . A female co-worker, Brock, reported to management that Hnin was making comments and gestures suggesting she was having a sexual relationship with…

This week we get a “hairy” case from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. African-American former Boston police officers, a former cadet and others who tested positive for cocaine use claimed that the department’s use of hair samples to test for drug use had a disparate impact on blacks. The plaintiffs…

In a rather straightforward application of employment law analysis, the United States First Circuit Court of Appeals decided that a former Walgreens manager had not presented sufficient evidence of age discrimination for his case to proceed to trial. Manager Adamson was written up for poor customer service on two occasions. For the prior three years…

According to a just released study, law partners graded the same writing sample based at least in part on the race of the writer. The study published by the consulting firm Nextions, “Written in Black and White: Exploring Confirmation Bias in Racialized Perception of Writing Skills,” used perhaps a somewhat flawed methodology. and does not…

Employment Law – MetLife Settles with Employees for $1.97 Million. A plaintiff’s class has submitted a request for preliminary approval of a settlement with MetLife for $1,970,000. In a case before the United State District Court for the Central District of California, a class representing MetLife financial service representatives alleged that MetlIfe made improper withholdings…

Is the inability to sit for an extended period of time a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act? One court has said that it could be. In Parada v. Banco Industrial de Venezuela, C.A., Case No. 12-3525 (2nd Cir., Mar. 25, 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has asked…

The EEOC got hammered for dawdling in its investigation and bringing a claim that prejudiced the employer because of the delay. The employee, a supervisor, said he got fired for complaining that only Hispanics received certain supervisory positions. He claimed discrimination based on his “American” national origin – somewhat of a reverse national origin discrimination…

In Flex Frac Logistics, L.L.C., et al. v. NLRB, Case No. 12-60752 (5th Cir., Mar. 24, 2014), Flex Frac, a non-union trucking company, asked the court of appeals to overturn an Administrative Law Judge’s decision, affirmed by the National Labor Relations Board, that the company’s employee confidentiality policy constituted an unfair labor practice. The policy…

More Overtime Expansion On Saturday, March 15, 2014, President Obama continued his push to help middle income workers by making more employees eligible for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). The FLSA is the federal law that requires employers to pay time and a-half to wage for work employees. On March 13,…

Current Law People who employ housekeepers and others to perform household services in their home for at least 8 hours per week are required to pay the minimum wage and overtime. Babysitters who work a regular, steady schedule for more than 8 hours per week are covered too. One would think that home health care…

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.